|
|
WORKSHOPS
|
Saturday,
July 7
Upcoming GECCO-2001
Birds-of-a-feather Workshops
The
GECCO-2001 Program Committee is pleased
to announce the following Bird-of-a-feather
workshops to be held during the 2001 Genetic
and Evolutionary Computation Conference
(GECCO-2001).
GECCO-2001 Workshops will be held on Saturday
July 7, 2001. Anyone registered for GECCO-2001
may attend these workshops; no advanced
notice is required. For information regarding
participating or presenting at a particular
workshop, please see the workshop homepage
for further details. For general inquiries
regarding workshops, please contact Soraya
Rana Stevens at sstevens@bbn.com.
The workshop schedule will be posted on
this page as soon as it is available.
|
|
|
|
|
Coevolution : Turning Adaptative Algorithms upon Themselves
Richard
K. Belew and Hugues Juillé
[Summary]
[Further details]
Evolutionary Algorithms
for Dynamic Optimization Problems
Juergen Branke and Thomas Baeck
[Summary]
[Further
details]
Optimal Structural
Design using Genetic and Evolutionary Computation
Scott Burns
[Summary] [Further
details]
The Next Ten Years
of Scheduling Research
Peter Cowling and Graham Kendall
[Summary] [Further
details]
Second Workshop on
Memetic Algorithms (2nd WOMA)
William Hart, Natalio Krasnogor, and Jim Smith
[Summary] [Further
details]
Computation in Gene
Expression
Hillol Kargupta
[Summary] [Further
details]
Optimization by Building
and Using Probabilistic Models (OBUPM) 2001
Martin Pelikan and Kumara Sastry
[Summary] [Further
details]
Evolution of sensors
in nature, hardware, and simulation
Daniel Polani, Thomas Uthmann, and Kerstin Dautenhahn
[Summary] [Further
details]
Non-Routine Design
with Evolutionary Systems
Josiah Poon and Mary Lou Maher
[Summary] [Further
details]
Representations and
Operators for Network Problems
Franz Rothlauf
[Summary] [Further
details]
Real-life Evolutionary
Design Optimisation
Rajkumar Roy , Graham Jared, Ashutosh Tiwari and Olivier Munaux
[Summary] [Further
details]
Evolutionary
COmputation and Multi-Agent Systems (ECOMAS)
Robert E. Smith, Claudio Bonacina, Cefn Hoile and Paul Marrow
[Summary] [Further
details]
Dynamics of Evolutionary
Algorithms
Chris Stephens and Riccardo Poli
[Summary] [Further
details]
Coevolution : Turning Adaptative Algorithms upon Themselves
Richard
K. Belew and Hugues Juillé
Coevolution has now been observed within natural
populations for almost 50 years, and exploited in computer
simulations for a decade. Applications of coevolutionary
search make it seem that some of the same mechanisms
which have allowed natural evolution to achieve the
complex living systems we know today can be captured
in an algorithmic framework. However, it seems that
coevolution has never reached the level of promise that
one would have expected following the initial encouraging
experiments. Also, subsequent analysis makes it appears
that the reasons for successes that have been achieved
are not always clearly understood.
The purpose of that workshop is twofold. First, we will
compare researchers' views of coevolution and make explicit
the important issues associated with the study of coevolution.
Our goals are to adopt a shared system of technical
definitions, and to then identify classes of problems
for which a coevolutionary approach offers a definitive
advantage for improving search over other approaches.
Underlying this approach is the analysis of the heuristics
embedded in coevolutionary frameworks that make them
more effective.
Second, we will consider coevolution in the context
of open-ended (a.k.a. exogenous, emergent) adaptation.
Coevolution has been proposed as the solution to problems
like self-learning and the generation of solutions to
progressively more difficult problems. But computational
learning theory seems to imply intrinsic limits on the
effectiveness of any learning algorithm presented with
finite data. Should coevolution be considered just one
more method for controlling search, or are there opportunities
for breakthroughs based on the exploitation of coevolutionary
frameworks? Given evidence of coevolutionary "arms-race"
in natural environments, what might this say about distributions
of "natural" vs. "artificial" training sets?
|
Evolutionary Algorithms for Dynamic Optimization Problems
Juergen Branke and Thomas Baeck
Many real-world optimization problems are eventually
dynamic. New jobs are to be added to the schedule, the
quality of the raw material may be changing, new orders
have to be included into the vehicle routing problem
etc. In such cases, when the problem changes over the
course of the optimization, the purpose of the optimization
algorithm changes from finding an optimal solution to
being able to contiuously track the movement of the
optimum through time. Since in a sense natural evolution
is a process of continuous adaptation, it seems straightforward
to consider evolutionary algorithms as appropriate candidates
for dynamic optimization problems.
Several attempts have been made to modify evolutionary
algorithms, to tune them for optimization in a changing
environment. It was observed in all these studies, that
the dynamic environment requires the evolutionary algorithm
to maintain sufficient diversity for a continuous adaptation
to the changes of the landscape. Although the interest
in evolutionary algorithms for dynamic optimization
problems is growing and a number of authors have proposed
an even greater number of new approaches, the field
lacks a general understanding as to suitable benchmark
problems, fair comparisons and measurement of algorithm
quality.
The goal of the workshop would be to foster interest
in the important subject of evolutionary algorithms
for dynamic optimization problems, get together the
researchers working on that topic, and to discuss recent
trends in the area.
|
Optimal Structural Design using Genetic and Evolutionary
Computation
Scott Burns
The optimal design of civil engineering structures has
been the subject of considerable research activity for
many decades. Many aspects of structural optimization
are inherently discrete/combinatorial in nature, and
defy solution by classical methods. These aspects include
topological layout of structural members, member selection
from available standard sizes or material types, placement
of sensors and actuators for dynamically controlled
(smart) structures, selection and orientation of layers
or reinforcement in composite structural materials,
multi-objective structural design, identification of
multiple/alternative optimal designs, selection of support
locations, conceptual design, identification of collapse
mechanisms, aesthetics in structural design, and life-cycle
design.
This workshop will focus on the application of genetic
and evolutionary computation to the design of civil
engineering structures. Specific issues, in addition
to those identified above, include hybrid methods, which
combine GA with structural optimization-specific local
methods to improve efficiency, constraint handling techniques,
and the design of unique genetic operators and schema
representations.
This workshop is being co-sponsored by the American
Society of Civil Engineers (ASCE) Technical Committee
on Optimal Structural Design.
|
The Next Ten Years of Scheduling Research
Peter Cowling and Graham Kendall
This workshop will allow those attending to discuss
how scheduling research can be advanced in the next
ten years. There are many techniques that have been
reported in the literature that have produced excellent
results when applied to scheduling problems. For example
the use of meta-heuristic techniques (such as tabu search
and simulated annealing) and evolutionary techniques
(such as genetic and memetic algorithms). One emerging
research area is to develop heuristics that operate
at a higher level of generality than current technology
can support. This will involve advances in heuristics,
meta-heuristics and an emerging technique tentatively
called a hyper-heuristic. Another interesting idea is
to use an "adaptive" heuristic. This uses the idea that
a scheduling problem can be solved using a heuristic
but, for many reasons, this heuristic can lead to solutions
which, although, better than previous efforts, can be
even better if the heuristic is allowed to adapt as
the search progresses. Through this workshop we hope
to achieve three main aims: Allow the delegates to learn
about some of the latest techniques and ideas that are
being applied by leading researchers in the scheduling
community. Invite other researchers to present their
ideas as to how the field should develop in the next
ten years. We are not looking for results of their current
research, rather we are looking for new, blue sky ideas
that can lead the research in the near future. Promote
discussion on these ideas so that the scheduling community
as a whole can benefit.
|
Memetic algorithms
William Hart, Natalio Krasnogor, and Jim Smith
Memetic algorithms (MAs) are evolutionary algorithms
(EAs) that apply a separate local search process to
refine individuals (i.e. improve their fitness by hill-climbing).
Under different contexts and situations, MAs are also
known as hybrid EAs, genetic local searchers, Baldwinian
EAs, Lamarkian EAs, etc.
Combining global and local search is a strategy used
by many successful global optimization approaches, and
MAs have in fact been recognized as a powerful algorithmic
paradigm for evolutionary computing. In particular,
the relative advantage of MAs over EAs is quite consistent
on complex search spaces.
It is the purpose of this workshop to bring together
researchers working on the general topic of Memetic
Algorithms. This workshop will provide a forum for identifying
and exploring the key issues that affect the theory,
design and application of MAs.
|
Computation in Gene Expression
Hillol Kargupta
The
gene expression process in nature extracts the information
coded in the DNA in order to generate the phenotype
of a living organism. This process includes the production
of proteins from the DNA through the construction of
mRNA and the subsequent expression during the different
developmental stages. It is a very important biological
process. It also appears to be very important from the
perspective of genetic search. The Gene expression manipulates
of the genetic representation. Representation plays
an important role in problem solving which is widely
acknowledged in many fields such as physics, mathematics,
engineering, machine learning, optimization and many
others. Representation transformations are often used
in these fields for solving problems efficiently. Therefore
representation transformations and manipulations in
gene expression allude intriguing possibilities.
This workshop will focus on exploring gene expression
based on our basic understanding of genetic search,
learning, and optimization. The topics of interest include,
but are not limited to:
- Theoretical
and experimental analysis of representation transformations
offered by the natural gene expression process.
- Relation
of gene expression and efficient, scalable evolutionary
computation.
-
Design, implementations, and experiments of evolutionary
algorithms such as genetic algorithms, genetic programming,
evolutionary strategy and other algorithms that are
directly motivated by the gene expression process.
- Applications
of gene expression-based algorithms.
|
Optimization by Building and Using Probabilistic Models
(OBUPM) 2001
Martin Pelikan and Kumara Sastry
Algorithms that replace two-parent recombination of
genetic algorithms by building and simulating a probabilistic
model of promising solutions have received much attention
over the past years. The proposed methods have resolved
many problems of other evolutionary algorithms and are
increasingly used to solve various problem of practical
and theoretical importance. Theory was designed to understand
the dynamics of the algorithms as well as their limits.
The purpose of this workshop is to:
- review
and describe the basic principles of discussed methods
- present
recent developments in the covered area of research,
- discuss
current problems and future directions of research
in this area
- encourage
communication among active researchers in the area
and other participants.
|
Evolution of Sensors in Nature, Hardware, and Simulation
Daniel Polani, Thomas Uthmann, and Kerstin Dautenhahn
In natural evolution one finds impressive examples for
the principle of exploiting new sensory channels and
making use of the implicit information they encode.
Different senses have emerged in a vast multitude of
variants, often utilizing organs not originally "intended"
for the purpose they serve at present. Motivated by
these observations, the topic of sensor evolution is
becoming a very modern and promising direction of research
between biology, robotics and Artificial Life. The workshop
strives at insights into biological strategies to access
new information channels, at developing new concepts
for design of sensors for flexible and adaptive autonomous
agents and an understanding of the relationship between
the information available to an agent and the way it
is processed.
|
Non-Routine Design with Evolutionary Systems
Josiah
Poon and Mary Lou Maher
Several
researchs have applied evolutionary algorithms to non-routine
problems, e.g. music,
drawing, architectural design. For these problems, a significant
portion of time is spent in
identifying the variables and constraints. Depending upon
the stages and the nature of the
design, a global optimal solution may either not exist
or is not necessary. The tradeoffs made
under various circumstances create niches in the search
space, where the best solution in one
niche is hard to compare with the best performing one
in another niche. Evolutionary algorithms
have been demonstrated to be helpful in the realm of creative
design from some of these projects.
In fact, the evolutionary approach is a very good candidate
to be a generator of "solutions that
can be".
The purpose of this workshop is to discuss and report
on work related to:
-
The roles of evolutionary algorithms in various stages
of a problem solving process.
- Coevolution
of problems and solutions.
- Emergence
of features and functionalities in solutions.
- Principles
drawn from evolutionary systems which address non-routine
design.
- Models,
architectures, genetic operators which bring forth
creativity.
- Interactive
evolution.
- Evolutionary
algorithms to assist human designers in producing
non-routine and creative
design.
- Evolutionary
algorithms to generate non-routine and creative design
automatically.
|
Representations and Operators for Network Problems
Franz Rothlauf
Finding good solutions for network design problems is
important in many fields such as telecommunications,
computer, backbone access, transportation and distribution
networks. Over the last years genetic algorithms have
been applied with success to a wide variety of these
different problems. One of the major design issues is
how the network could be represented as an artificial
chromosome and what kind of operators could be defined
on the chromosome.
The workshop is intended to give an overview over the
existing approaches and to discuss various representations
and operators in the context of genetic and evolutionary
computation. It should compare theoretical properties
and empirical performance characteristics of different
representations and operators and try to find explanations
for performance differences of a genetic algorithm.
The workshop will be focused on representations and
operators for network problems, but it welcomes interesting
contributions to encoding issues that are meaningful
for network representations.
|
Real-life Evolutionary Design Optimisation
Rajkumar Roy, Graham Jared, Ashutosh Tiwari and Olivier
Munaux
The aim of this workshop is to explore the use of evolutionary
computation techniques for solving real-life design
optimisation problems. These problems pose additional
challenges for the optimisation techniques due to their
following characteristics:
- The
principal feature of most real-life problems is the
presence of multiple measures of performance, or objectives,
which should be optimised simultaneously.
- In
most of these problems, there is no prior knowledge
regarding the shape of search space. There is also
no prior information about the performance and location
of the optimal and sub-optimal points in the search
space.
- The
complexity of these problems is also increased due
to the qualitative issues, like manufacturability
and designers' special preferences, invariably associated
with real-life problems.
-
Most of these problems are computationally expensive
and difficult to solve due the presence of multiple
interacting dimensions and several optimal solutions.
- Further,
most of these problems require some constraints to
be satisfied.
-
Finally, the model development for the solution of
real-life optimisation problems is a very complex
task.
This
workshop provides a forum for identifying and exploring
the key issues that affect the industrial application
of evolutionary-based computation techniques.
|
Evolutionary
COmputation and Multi-Agent Systems (ECOMAS)
Robert E. Smith, Claudio Bonacina, Cefn Hoile and
Paul Marrow
Multi-agent systems (MAS) are collections of interacting
autonomous entities. The behaviour of the MAS is a result
of the repeated asynchronous action and interaction
of the agents. Understanding how to engineer adaptation
and self-organisation is thus central to the application
of agents on a large scale. Moreover, multi-agent simulations
can also be used to study emergent behaviour in real
systems.
Desirable self-organisation is observed in many biological,
social and physical systems. However, fostering these
conditions in artificial systems proves to be difficult
and offers the potential for undesirable behaviours
to emerge. Thus, it is vital to be able to understand
and shape emergent behaviours in agent based systems.
Current mathematical and empirical tools give only a
partial insight into emergent behaviour in large, agent-based
societies. EC provides on paradigm for addressing this
need. Moreover, EC techniques are inherently based on
a distributed paradigm (natural evolution), making them
particularly well suited for adaptation in agents.
At the same time, ideas from natural ecosystems or economies,
such as resource flows, niches, and spatial context
or neighbourhood can contribute both to the development
of MAS and to the improvement of EC techniques. The
interaction between these different sources of natural
inspiration and the two computing disciplines of MAS
and EC is beginning to stimulate a range of systems
with properties that extend the MAS and EC concepts
in new and interesting directions.
|
Dynamics of Evolutionary
Algorithms
Chris Stephens and Riccardo Poli
One of the basic requirements of a theory is that it offer
a framework within which observations may be qualitatively
and quantitatively understood. Some of the early proposals
to understand the dynamics of evolutionary algorithms,
such as GAs and GP - Schema Theorems and the Building
Block Hypothesis - have until very recently had only mixed
success in this regard, being sources of controversy as
well as insight. The Building Block Hypothesis relies
on the Schema theorem for quantitative support and the
latter has traditionally been written as an inequality,
neglecting the effect of string or schema creation. Recently,
however, formulations of EA dynamics have appeared which,
like Markov chain models are exact, but in distinction
have Schema type theorems and the Building Block Hypothesis
(suitably reinterpreted) as key characteristics.
Completely separate developments have led to the formulation
of EA dynamics as Markov chains. In these exact, intrinsically
microscopic models however the Schema theorem and Building
Block hypothesis are neither manifest nor, apparently,
necessary.
Other researchers have directed their efforts to develop
approximate models with high predictive power, such as
the statistical mechanics approach or the Illinois engineering-principles-based
approach.
The purpose of this workshop is to bring together those
interested in the dynamical theory of evolutionary algorithms
and provide an open forum for debating the advantages
and disadvantages of the different formulations, their
usefulness for giving an intuitive, qualitative understanding
of EA dynamics and making testable quantitative predictions.
-A
roundtable discussion to be held Sunday afternoon from
2:00 - 5:30
|
The GECCO-2001 Bird-of-a-feather workshops are being organized
by:
Soraya Rana Stevens
BBN Technologies
10 Moulton Street MS 6/3A
Cambridge, MA 02138
617-873-2681
sstevens@bbn.com
|
|